Psychology RootsTable of Contents
General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale
Scale Name
General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale
Author Details
STACEY S. PARK and LEE A. ROSÉN
Jia Yuin Fam and Fellows
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
General attitudes towards marriage scale (GAMS): The attitudes towards the marriage of adolescents were measured with the ten items GAMS (Park and Rosén 2013). The General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale is part of the Marital Scales. The Marital Scales consist of a set of three scales which was designed to measure intent, attitudes, and aspects of marital relationships.
The General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale examines individuals’ perceptions of marriage using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 6 (Strongly agree). The content of the General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale includes positive attitudes, negative attitudes, as well as fears and doubts towards marriage. A higher total score upon adjusting for reverse scoring indicates more positive attitudes towards marriage. The General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .84) and construct validity in the original article.
Intent to marry scale (IMS): The three items IMS was developed alongside with General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale in the Marital Scales (Park and Rosén 2013). The IMS attempts to examine individuals’ intention to get married in the future. The IMS employs the same item response of GAMS, ranging from 0 to 6, and a higher adjusted total score indicates greater intention to marry. Comparably, the internal consistency of IMS is remarkably good (α = .91) and valid. Overt marital conflict: The ten items overt marital conflict was originally developed as a measurement for mother reported overt marital hostility (Porter and O’Leary 1980).
Participants responded to questions in relation to how frequent inter-parental conflict occur in front of them. The items’ responses are reversely scored, ranging from 1 (Very often) to 5 (Never), with a higher total score indicates more frequent arguments between parents. This instrument has relatively good test-retest reliability (α = .96) and convergent validity (Porter and O’Leary 1980).
The revisited version of inventory for parent and peer attachment (IPPA). The revisited IPPA is three separable inventories that are intended to capture adolescents’ relationship quality with both parents and peers (25 items each; Armsden and Greenberg 1987). As only the mother-adolescent relationship is of concern in the present study, the participants were instructed to rate the occurrence of 25 potential mother-offspring interactions from 1 (Almost never of never true) to 5 (Almost always or always true). The total score was summed up after adjusting for inverse scores, with a higher total score indicates a more positive relationship with the mother. The psychometric properties of revisited IPPA were well-tested in various settings (Guarnieri et al. 2010; Gullone and Robinson 2005).
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Purpose: The GATMS can be used in both clinical and research settings to assess young people’s views on marriage, especially in populations with experiences of parental divorce. It provides valuable data on how these attitudes may influence their future relationship decisions.
- Subscales:
- Format: The General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale (GATMS) consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
- Scoring: Responses are averaged across items, with higher scores on the positive subscale indicating more favorable attitudes towards marriage and higher scores on the negative subscale reflecting more negative perceptions.
Reliability and Validity
The General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale (GATMS) has been validated in several studies, showing strong psychometric properties. In the study by Fam et al. (2017), the Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was reported to be 0.91, indicating high internal consistency. The scale has been demonstrated to have construct validity, making it suitable for both adolescents and adults in various cultural contexts.
Available Versions
Multiple-Items
Reference
Fam, J. Y., Yaacob, S. N., Juhari, R., Arshat, Z., & Mukhtar, F. (2017). General attitudes towards marriage scale: Psychometric properties in Malaysian adolescents of divorced families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 3351-3359.
Park, S. S., & Rosén, L. A. (2013). The marital scales: Measurement of intent, attitudes, and aspects regarding marital relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 54(4), 295-312.
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the General Attitudes Towards Marriage Scale (GATMS)?
The GATMS is a psychological tool that assesses individuals’ cognitive and affective attitudes towards marriage.
Who uses the GATMS?
The GATMS is used by researchers and clinicians to explore views on marriage, particularly among adolescents and those from divorced families.
What does the GATMS measure?
The scale measures both positive and negative attitudes towards marriage, providing a comprehensive understanding of personal views.
How reliable is the GATMS?
The GATMS has high reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91, ensuring consistent results across various studies.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
Share With Us
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
