Psychology RootsTable of Contents
Fragility of Happiness Scale
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Fragility of Happiness Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Fragility of Happiness Scale
Scale Name
Fragility of Happiness Scale
Author Details
Mohsen Joshanloo
Translation Availability
Not Sure
Background/Description
The Fragility of Happiness Scale (FHS) was developed by Joshanloo et al. (2015) to measure individuals’ belief that happiness is fleeting and easily lost. This scale addresses the perception that happiness is vulnerable and can be quickly diminished by external circumstances. The belief in the fragility of happiness is a psychological phenomenon that may influence one’s overall well-being, life satisfaction, and emotional regulation. The primary purpose to measure the fragility of happiness beliefs (that happiness is temporary and may be easily replaced by neutral or unpleasant states)
The FHS was studied across 15 national groups in a large-scale cross-cultural examination to understand how individuals from different cultures view the concept of happiness. The scale is particularly useful in examining cultural and societal differences in happiness perceptions, as well as in individual clinical and research settings.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Format: The Fragility of Happiness Scale (FHS) consists of 4 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
- Scoring: The total score is obtained by summing responses to all items. Higher scores indicate a stronger belief in the fragility of happiness.
Reliability and Validity
The FHS has demonstrated high reliability and validity across diverse cultural contexts. The scale has a reported Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.78, indicating a good level of internal consistency. Cross-cultural studies support the validity of the scale, confirming its utility in measuring happiness beliefs in different cultural settings.
Available Versions
04-Items
Reference
Joshanloo, M., Weijers, D., Jiang, D., Han, G., Bae, J., Pang, J., Ho, L., Ferreira, M. C., Demir, M., Rizwan, M., Khilji, I. A., Achoui, M., Asano, R., Igarashi, T., Tsukamoto, S., Lamers, S. M. A., Turan, Y., Sundaram, S., Yeung, V. W., Poon, W., Lepshokova, Z., Panyusheva, T., Natalia, A. (2015). The fragility of happiness beliefs across 15 national groups. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1185-1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9553-0
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Fragility of Happiness Scale?
The FHS measures the belief that happiness is fragile and can be easily lost, providing insight into emotional vulnerabilities related to happiness.
Who should use the FHS?
The FHS is used by psychologists, researchers, and clinicians interested in studying happiness beliefs in individuals or across different cultural groups.
How is the FHS scored?
The FHS is scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate a stronger belief in the fragility of happiness.
What does a high score on the FHS indicate?
A high score suggests that an individual believes happiness is easily diminished or lost due to external factors.
How reliable is the FHS?
The FHS has demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78, indicating reliability across diverse populations.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
Share With Us
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
