Duke Social Support and Stress Scale

by Psychology Roots
105 views

Duke Social Support and Stress Scale

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Duke Social Support and Stress Scale”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About Duke Social Support and Stress Scale

Scale Name

Duke Social Support and Stress Scale

Author Details

George R. Parkerson

Translation Availability

English

Background/Description

The Duke Social Support and Stress Scale (DUSOCS), developed by George R. Parkerson in 1989, is a 24-item self-administered or interviewer-administered scale designed to measure perceived support and stress from family and nonfamily relationships in family practice settings. Published in Journal of Family Practice (1989), it examines the family environment’s role in health outcomes, focusing on subjective perceptions of supportiveness and stressfulness. The DUSOCS includes 12 support items and 12 stress items across six family categories (e.g., spouse, parents) and four nonfamily categories (e.g., friends, coworkers), plus two items identifying the most supportive and stressful relationships. It is used to identify individuals at risk of social isolation and study social determinants of health.

Each item is rated on a 3-point scale (0 = none, 1 = some, 2 = a lot; “no such person” or blank = 0). Scores are calculated for family support (sum of 6 items + 2 if family member is most supportive, divided by 14, scaled to 0–100), nonfamily support (sum of 4 items + 2 if nonfamily member is most supportive, divided by 10, scaled to 0–100), family stress, and nonfamily stress. Total support and stress scores sum raw scores, divide by 22, and scale to 0–100, with higher scores indicating greater support or stress. The DUSOCS was validated with 249–314 ambulatory patients (mean age ≈ 30–65 years, mixed gender, U.S.-based), correlating with family strength (r = 0.43–0.51) and health outcomes (r = -0.32 to -0.44). It is used in clinical psychology, family medicine, and public health. Access is available via Duke University (healthmeasures.mc.duke.edu) with permission.

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

  • Obtain the DUSOCS from Parkerson et al. (1989) or Duke University (healthmeasures.mc.duke.edu), ensuring ethical permissions.
  • Explain to participants (adults 18+ in family practice or general population) that the scale assesses support and stress from relationships, emphasizing confidentiality and voluntary participation.
  • Administer the 24-item scale via self-report or interview in clinical or research settings, rating current perceptions of support and stress.
  • Estimated completion time is 5–10 minutes.
  • Ensure a private, supportive environment; provide mental health or social support resources (e.g., counseling services) and adapt for accessibility (e.g., large print, simplified instructions) if needed.

Reliability and Validity

The DUSOCS demonstrates moderate psychometric properties (Parkerson et al., 1989). Two-week test-retest reliability (N not specified) ranges from r = 0.40 (family stress) to 0.76 (family support), with nonfamily support (r = 0.67) and nonfamily stress (r = 0.68). In a larger sample (N = 314), test-retest correlations are 0.27–0.58 for stress and 0.50–0.73 for support. Six-day intraclass correlations are 0.92 (self-administered) and 0.80 (interviewer-administered). Internal consistency is moderate (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.53–0.70).

Convergent validity is supported by correlations with Olson’s Family Strength measure (r = 0.43–0.51) and intrafamily/marital strain (r = 0.33–0.45, N = 249). Family stress correlates with Duke-UNC Health Profile symptom status (r = -0.32) and emotional function (r = -0.44). Construct validity is evidenced by family stress predicting higher healthcare use over 18 months (N = 314). Factor analysis identifies two factors: confidant and affective support. Discriminant validity shows low correlations with demographic variables. Pairing with the MOS Social Support Survey or Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire enhances comprehensive assessment.

Available Versions

24-Items

Reference

Parkerson, G. R., Jr, Broadhead, W. E., & Tse, C. K. (1991). Validation of the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. Family medicine23(5), 357–360.

Important Link

Scale File:

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale measure?
It measures perceived support and stress from family and nonfamily relationships.

Who is the target population?
Adults (18+) in family practice or general population for health research.

How long does it take to administer?
Approximately 5–10 minutes.

Can it inform interventions?
Yes, it identifies social isolation and stress to guide family medicine interventions.

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.