Psychology RootsTable of Contents
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Ambivalent Sexism Inventory”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Like modern sexism and neosexism, ambivalent sexism builds on modern forms of racism. Unlike those scales,
the ambivalent sexism scale builds specifically on ambivalent racism (Katz & Hass, 1988). But unlike all that earlier work, ambivalent sexism analyzes the interdependent relationships between men and women, to predict the
specific sources of ambivalence (Glick & Fiske, 1996). Like all ingroup-outgroup relations, one group (men) has higher societal status, but uniquely among ingroup-outgroup relations, men and women are intimately interdependent. The theory posited male ambivalence having three sources: paternalism, gender differentiation, and heterosexuality. Women who resist subordination are punished by hostile sexism (HS), which resembles but is more intimately relational than earlier concepts of old-fashioned sexism. The theory predicts resentment of nontraditional women along each dimension: dominative paternalism, competitive gender differentiation, and heterosexual hostility.
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Avail Reference Files: [sociallocker id=64051]
Fiske‚ S.T.‚ & North‚ M.S. (2014)
Email:
- Fiske‚ S.T.‚ & North‚ M.S. (2014). Measures of stereotyping and prejudice: Barometers of bias. In G. Boyle & D. Saklofske (Eds.)‚ Measures of Personality & Social Psychological Constructs‚ 684-718 : DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00024-3
- Fiske‚ Susan T. (2000). Stereotyping‚ prejudice‚ and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution‚ culture‚ mind‚ and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology; 30: 299-322
- Glick P.‚ & Fiske S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology‚ 70(3)‚ 491–512.
- Glick‚ P. & Fiske‚ S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.)‚ Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33‚ pp 115-188). Thousand Oaks‚ CA: Academic.
- Glick‚ P.‚ & Fiske‚ S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly‚ 35(3)‚ 530-535.
[/sociallocker]
Information:
The purpose of our website is only to help students to assist them in finding the best suitable instrument for their research, especially in Pakistan where students waste a lot of time in search of the instruments. It is totally free of cost and only for creating awareness and assisting students and researchers for good research. Moreover, it is necessary for you to take the permission of scales from their representative authors before use because copyrights are reserved by the respected authors.
Help Us Improve This Article
Did you find an inaccuracy? We work hard to provide accurate and scientifically reliable information. If you have found an error of any kind, please let us know.
Add comment. we appropriate your effort.
Share with Us
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.
Follow
