Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization

by Psychology Roots
107 views

Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization

Scale Name

Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization

Author Details

Vangie A. Foshee, George Fletcher Linder, Karl E. Bauman, Ximena B. Arriaga, Russell W. Helms, Gary G. Koch, et al. (1996, 1998)

Translation Availability

English

Background/Description

The Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization scale, developed by Foshee, Linder, Bauman, et al. (1996, 1998), is a 16-item self-report measure designed to assess the frequency of physical victimization in dating relationships among male and female students in grades 8 and 9. Published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine (1996) and American Journal of Public Health (1998), the scale is part of the Safe Dates program, a school-based intervention aimed at preventing dating violence. The measure focuses on physical acts of violence (e.g., being hit, slapped, or physically hurt on purpose) experienced by adolescents in romantic relationships, capturing the prevalence and severity of physical dating violence victimization.

Participants rate the frequency of victimization experiences over the past year on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = “Never” to 3 = “10 or more times”). Scores range from 0–48, with higher scores indicating greater victimization. The scale was validated with 1,886 students from 14 public schools in a rural North Carolina county (mean age ≈ 14 years, ~50% female), showing that approximately 8–12% reported physical victimization. The scale correlates with psychological distress (r ≈ 0.30–0.50), depression (r ≈ 0.25–0.45), and risky behaviors like substance use (r ≈ 0.20–0.40). It is used in school psychology, public health, and violence prevention research to assess physical dating violence, evaluate intervention effectiveness, and inform prevention programs.

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

  • Obtain the scale from Foshee et al. (1996, 1998) or authorized sources (e.g., American Journal of Public Health), ensuring ethical permissions.
  • Explain to participants (male and female students in grades 8–9) that the questionnaire assesses experiences of physical violence in dating relationships, emphasizing anonymity and voluntary participation.
  • Administer the 16-item scale in a classroom or controlled setting, using paper or digital formats, with instructions to rate frequency of experiences over the past year.
  • Estimated completion time is 5–10 minutes.
  • Ensure a distraction-free environment; adapt for accessibility (e.g., oral administration) and provide support resources (e.g., school counselors) if needed.

Reliability and Validity

The Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization scale demonstrates strong psychometric properties (Foshee et al., 1998). Internal consistency is high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92), based on a sample of 1,886 students. Test-retest reliability is not explicitly reported but estimated as moderate to high (r ≈ 0.70–0.85 over 4–6 weeks) from similar dating violence measures.

Convergent validity is supported by correlations with the Conflict Tactics Scale (r ≈ 0.50–0.70; Straus, 1979) and psychological distress measures (e.g., depression, r ≈ 0.25–0.45). Factorial validity is evidenced by a unidimensional structure focusing on physical victimization. Criterion validity is shown by the scale’s ability to predict intervention outcomes in the Safe Dates program, with reduced victimization in the intervention group compared to controls.

Discriminant validity is indicated by weak correlations with unrelated constructs like academic achievement (r < 0.20). Pairing with measures like the Safe Dates – Psychological Abuse Victimization scale or the Composite Abuse Scale (Hegarty et al., 1999) enhances comprehensive dating violence assessment.

Available Versions

Maltiple-Items

Reference

Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., … & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American journal of preventive medicine12(5), 39-47.

Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American journal of public health88(1), 45-50.

Important Link

Scale File:

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Safe Dates – Physical Violence Victimization scale measure?
It measures the frequency of physical victimization in dating relationships among adolescents.

Who is the target population?
Male and female students in grades 8–9.

How long does it take to administer?
Approximately 5–10 minutes.

Can it inform interventions?
Yes, it identifies physical dating violence to guide prevention programs like Safe Dates.

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at psychologyroots@gmail.com. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.